BLM REA CYR 2013 Community Locations in the Central Yukon Study Area

Metadata Updated: November 12, 2020

This point file was derived from the community footprints for the Central Yukon REA. The points were manually edited and moved from their default position to a location that corresponded with the actual community location based on satellite imagery. The footprint feature class was produced by digitally tracing the built areas from satellite imagery. This was done to represent the actual footprints more accurately than would have been possible from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (TIGER) files. TIGER files are geospatial files with information on several political and administrative units. These shapefiles include polygon boundaries of geographic areas and features, linear features including roads and hydrography, and point features. The communities in Alaska were released as a polygon shapefile, with each community’s boundary identified. However, there were two major concerns with this file: i. Community boundary polygons represent the legal boundaries and not the actual developed areas. The actual developed area for each community in the region is much smaller than its legal boundary. Moreover in many instances, boundaries as identified in TIGER files are not legal boundaries recognized under state law. Therefore, these polygon boundaries are not accurate representations of existing communities, and over-represent the actual community footprints. ii. Many of the maps produced for this project show community-level social and demographic information. For better representation in such maps, a point file was used instead of a polygon file to identify communities. Generation of a point file from a polygon file is done by locating the point at the center of gravity of the polygon. Given the large polygons in the community TIGER file, centers of gravity are often well outside the actual community footprints. As a result, Census TIGER files were not used in identifying community footprints. Instead, each community’s footprint was digitized from satellite imagery. A majority of the communities in the CYR REA study area are small and their footprints are concentrated in small areas with some activities scattered around each community's central location. Population in each community is low and activity beyond identified footprint boundaries is limited to subsistence-use and inter-community trails.

Access & Use Information

License: No license information was provided. If this work was prepared by an officer or employee of the United States government as part of that person's official duties it is considered a U.S. Government Work.

Downloads & Resources


Metadata Date October 13, 2017
Metadata Created Date November 12, 2020
Metadata Updated Date November 12, 2020
Reference Date(s) December 7, 2016 (publication)
Frequency Of Update unknown

Metadata Source

Harvested from DOI Open Data

Additional Metadata

Resource Type Dataset
Metadata Date October 13, 2017
Metadata Created Date November 12, 2020
Metadata Updated Date November 12, 2020
Reference Date(s) December 7, 2016 (publication)
Responsible Party Unknown (Point of Contact)
Contact Email
Access Constraints Use Constraints: These data are provided by Bureau of Land Management (BLM) "as is" and may contain errors or omissions. The User assumes the entire risk associated with its use of these data and bears all responsibility in determining whether these data are fit for the User's intended use. The information contained in these data is dynamic and may change over time. The data are not better than the original sources from which they were derived, and both scale and accuracy may vary across the data set. These data may not have the accuracy, resolution, completeness, timeliness, or other characteristics appropriate for applications that potential users of the data may contemplate. The User is encouraged to carefully consider the content of the metadata file associated with these data. These data are neither legal documents nor land surveys, and must not be used as such. Official records may be referenced at most BLM offices. Please report any errors in the data to the BLM office for which it was obtained. The BLM should be cited as the data source in any products derived from these data. Any Users wishing to modify the data should describe the types of modifications they have performed. The User should not misrepresent the data, nor imply that changes made were approved or endorsed by BLM. This information may be updated without notification., Access Constraints: None, these data are considered public domain
Bbox East Long -141.055990292
Bbox North Lat 68.1418705418
Bbox South Lat 62.6641255414
Bbox West Long -162.969782048
Coupled Resource
Frequency Of Update unknown
Licence The BLM assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. No warranty is made by the BLM as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual use or aggregate use with other data; nor shall the act of distribution to contractors, partners, or beyond, constitute any such warranty for individual or aggregate data use with other data. Although these data have been processed successfully on computers of BLM, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by BLM regarding the use of these data on any other system, or for general or scientific purposes, nor does the fact of distribution constitute or imply any such warranty. In no event shall the BLM have any liability whatsoever for payment of any consequential, incidental, indirect, special, or tort damages of any kind, including, but not limited to, any loss of profits arising out of the use or reliance on the geographic data or arising out of the delivery, installation, operation, or support by BLM.
Metadata Language
Metadata Type geospatial
Progress UNKNOWN
Spatial Data Service Type
Spatial Reference System
Spatial Harvester True

Didn't find what you're looking for? Suggest a dataset here.