BLM REA CYR 2013 Near-term Future (2020s) Infestation Vulnerability

Metadata Updated: November 12, 2020

Survey intensity for non-native plant infestations in the Central Yukon area is not strong or consistent; we therefore developed an analytical model to identify areas that are perceived to be currently vulnerable to invasion by non-native plant species. This analysis is intended to supplement the empirical data, identify areas in which future surveys may be directed, and evaluate the potential change in vulnerability in the future. The analytical approach used here (variance partitioning via classification and regression tree) facilitates the evaluation of a large number of variables that may have non-linear relationships and complex interactions. This approach has been used elsewhere to understand patterns of plant invasion vulnerabilities. The purpose of this dataset is too identify vulnerability to invasion by non-native plants per 5th level hydrologic unit. We first determined the climate, habitat, and anthropogenic variables that are associated with watersheds having weed problems in Interior Alaska based on the AKEPIC dataset. We then determined which watersheds in the Central Yukon study area match those climate, habitat, and anthropogenic variables currently. Finally, we determined which watersheds in the Central Yukon study area are projected to have those climate, habitat, and anthropogenic variables in the future. Overall, we anticipate that invasive plant establishment will be geographically restricted in the current, near-term future, and long-term future. Most ecosystems and wildlife habitats will not be impacted by invasive species establishment. Our analysis indicated that percent developed land is the most important drivers of plant invasion at this scale. Areas predicted to be of highest current vulnerabilities follow the primary highways. Invasion vulnerabilities based on this model are anticipated to change in the long-term future time step, while no changes in watershed classification occur in the near term. The most dramatic change anticipated is associated with increased density of secondary roads associated with the “Roads to Resources” to the Ambler Mining District and preferred road to Nome. With earlier thaw dates, and potential increases in highway road density by 2060, HUCs along upper Steese Highway near Circle and the watershed around Kiana are predicted to transition from low vulnerabilities to high vulnerabilities.

Access & Use Information

License: No license information was provided. If this work was prepared by an officer or employee of the United States government as part of that person's official duties it is considered a U.S. Government Work.

Downloads & Resources

Dates

Metadata Date October 13, 2017
Metadata Created Date November 12, 2020
Metadata Updated Date November 12, 2020
Reference Date(s) July 11, 2016 (publication)
Frequency Of Update notPlanned

Metadata Source

Harvested from DOI Open Data

Additional Metadata

Resource Type Dataset
Metadata Date October 13, 2017
Metadata Created Date November 12, 2020
Metadata Updated Date November 12, 2020
Reference Date(s) July 11, 2016 (publication)
Responsible Party Alaska Center for Conservation Science, University of Alaska Anchorage (Point of Contact)
Contact Email
Guid
Access Constraints Use Constraints: These data are provided by Bureau of Land Management (BLM) "as is" and may contain errors or omissions. The User assumes the entire risk associated with its use of these data and bears all responsibility in determining whether these data are fit for the User's intended use. The information contained in these data is dynamic and may change over time. The data are not better than the original sources from which they were derived, and both scale and accuracy may vary across the data set. These data may not have the accuracy, resolution, completeness, timeliness, or other characteristics appropriate for applications that potential users of the data may contemplate. The User is encouraged to carefully consider the content of the metadata file associated with these data. These data are neither legal documents nor land surveys, and must not be used as such. Official records may be referenced at most BLM offices. Please report any errors in the data to the BLM office for which it was obtained. The BLM should be cited as the data source in any products derived from these data. Any Users wishing to modify the data should describe the types of modifications they have performed. The User should not misrepresent the data, nor imply that changes made were approved or endorsed by BLM. This information may be updated without notification., Access Constraints: None, these data are considered public domain
Bbox East Long -141.00179622
Bbox North Lat 69.0791829686
Bbox South Lat 62.0096770372
Bbox West Long -163.923094123
Coupled Resource
Frequency Of Update notPlanned
Licence The BLM assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. No warranty is made by the BLM as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual use or aggregate use with other data; nor shall the act of distribution to contractors, partners, or beyond, constitute any such warranty for individual or aggregate data use with other data. Although these data have been processed successfully on computers of BLM, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by BLM regarding the use of these data on any other system, or for general or scientific purposes, nor does the fact of distribution constitute or imply any such warranty. In no event shall the BLM have any liability whatsoever for payment of any consequential, incidental, indirect, special, or tort damages of any kind, including, but not limited to, any loss of profits arising out of the use or reliance on the geographic data or arising out of the delivery, installation, operation, or support by BLM.
Metadata Language
Metadata Type geospatial
Progress completed
Spatial Data Service Type
Spatial Reference System
Spatial Harvester True

Didn't find what you're looking for? Suggest a dataset here.